The CFP committee punished Indiana for a bye week and called it bad luck

Indiana didn't lose on Saturday. Indiana didn't play on Saturday. Indiana still fell from No. 4 to No. 9 in Tuesday's College Football Playoff rankings, and the committee's chair basically admitted the Hoosiers got docked for having the week off. The committee owes Indiana a better answer than bad luck.

You don't have to take my word for it. Hunter Yurachek said Indiana was "probably the victim of having a bye week at the wrong time." Think about who said that. He's the guy holding the pen, describing what the pen did.

RankCFB went back through every committee ranking since 2014 and couldn't find a team that fell more than three spots on a bye. Penn State slid from 8 to 11 in 2022. Nebraska went from 13 to 16 in 2014. Indiana dropped five, from a first-round bye to a road trip to Tennessee if the bracket were set today.

Now the committee's best case, and I'll give it the full weight. USA Today pointed out there was a broad consensus that Indiana was ranked too high in the first batch, so maybe this is just a correction. Yurachek pointed at real wins around them: Notre Dame over No. 1 Miami, Alabama's 31-13 win at LSU, Texas over Missouri, and UCLA winning at Minnesota a week after Indiana needed a 60-yard field goal at the end of regulation to force overtime against that same team. Every Big Ten team the Hoosiers have played lost last weekend, six losses in all, and IndyStar, citing ESPN, has their strength of schedule down to No. 42. Yurachek also said Indiana's offensive play is a discussion point in the room.

All true. I didn't love No. 4 either. But if the committee thought this offense was a problem and this schedule was soft, it had all of that on Nov. 3, and it said No. 4. Nothing about Indiana changed in seven days. Other people played, and the Hoosiers got charged for it.

Look at Miami if you want the incentive problem in one line. The Hurricanes lost 31-24 at Notre Dame and sit at No. 7. Indiana stayed home and sits at No. 9, behind an 8-1 team that just lost and behind three two-loss teams, Alabama, Texas and Tennessee. By the committee's math, losing a close one on the road was worth more than a week off. You can't build a system that says that and then act surprised when coaches stop scheduling breathers.

And yes, the strength-of-schedule part is real data. Opponents' results count. But when a ranking swings five spots on games you weren't in, it's telling you more about everybody else's Saturday than about your team. If the room wanted to correct a No. 4 it regretted, it should've said so out loud instead of hanging it on the calendar.

My problem isn't that Indiana is ninth. Ninth might be right. My problem is that nobody in that room will say "we had it wrong last week," so a team gets told it was unlucky for sitting still. That's the cop-out, and the chair said it on the record.

Indiana gets No. 18 USC on Saturday, a program it's 0-4 against all time and hasn't played since 1982, per IndyStar. Win that one and I'm pretty sure the committee rediscovers the defense its own chair called one of the best in the country. The Hoosiers won't have changed, just their number again, and somebody in that room ought to be embarrassed by it.

Our columnists are fictional characters written with AI. The facts come from the reported stories linked here.